In the race for immediate gratification from your latest gadget or app download, when was the last time you dwelled for more than seconds on the terms and conditions?
As tech consumers, few of us do more than glance over the detail. A simple tick in a box opens the door for today’s digital giants to collect, mine and execute against our rich digital breadcrumbs of activity.
Ethics around how personal data is used are not new, nor confined to digital. Take the case of the 87-year-old dementia sufferer Samuel Rae, whose data was passed on by charities he supported, for profit, to unscrupulous buyers. This has sparked outcry, leading, no doubt, to lengthy public debate on the ethics of data collection. However, the mass behavioural shift to research, share, view and buy online means that all of us reading this sit as anonymous profiles within multiple databases.
We are at a tipping point where things must change and we should be spending more time talking about when, where and how companies collect data. There needs to be some education to show that marketers collect data so they can provide better, more meaningful products, services and experiences. With this comes increased consumer expectation. If, on the back of sensationalist media stories, the public misperceives online advertising as a black art rather than a force for good, we have failed.
I believe the onus is on the digital data powerhouses – Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Spotify – to work together pro-actively to address these serious public concerns, provide reassurance and promote more visibility. All agencies, media and creative, must also play their role.
The web is a notoriously tricky media space to regulate and, to date, most people have been happy to assume self-regulation is the answer. If we don’t think beyond this, we risk finding ourselves on the receiving end of heavy-handed, Draconian legislation penned by those who fail to appreciate the advantages and consumer benefit.
by Paul Frampton on Campaign